Wt r u on abwt: Explosion in child 'text speak' leaves 90% of parents and teachers needing help with translation
- Parents frequently have to ask their children to translate text messages
- Education experts have warned against schools tolerating 'text speak'
- Michael Gove will introduce tests on more formal English grammar
|

Another language: Children now use an entirely different form of communication to their parents
The explosion in 'text speak' means many are now effectively using a different language.
Almost nine in ten parents and teachers say the abbreviated words and acronyms developed for speed when writing text messages have thrown up a language barrier between the generations.
And three-quarters said they frequently had to ask children to translate the contents of a text or email.
More than two-thirds of teachers also said the terms were now 'routinely' cropping up in essays and other work.
Adults reported messages from young children are becoming incomprehensible to them.
Examples include a text message a mother received from her eight-year-old child who wrote: 'Mum can M8 cotch at yard?'
This translates as: 'Mum, can my friend sleep over at our house this evening?'
Other popular words include rfd, meaning after, kwl, or cool, and churoo, or true.
Education experts yesterday warned schools' 'toleration' of the terms was 'eroding language'.
Chris McGovern, of the Campaign for Real Education, said: 'Children use text speak all the time. It's incomprehensible to a lot of people but you're never going to get rid of it. It's a social phenomenon.
'The problem is schools go out of their way to accommodate it when they should be promoting the full versions of words.
'A lot of teachers say language evolves so you have to accept it. Fortunately, [Education Secretary] Michael Gove is introducing tests which are much more formal and based on English grammar.'

Tradition: Michael Gove plans to encourage the use of a more formal type of English grammar in schools
This rises to 93 per cent of secondary school pupils, helping to embed text speak in common culture.
DO YOU KNOW YOUR TEXT SPEAK?
After - Rfd Oh my god - OMG
Tonight - 2nite Laugh out loud - LOL
Great - Gr8 Party - PRT
Before - B4 Wait - W8
Tomorrow - 2moro Wicked - WKD
Cool - kwl Hang out - cotch
Mate - M8 Home - yard
Pizza - peetsa About - abwt
True - churoo Because - bcuz
That - dat Busy - bzy
Computer - compy These - deez
face to face - f2f Hate - H8
Tonight - 2nite Laugh out loud - LOL
Great - Gr8 Party - PRT
Before - B4 Wait - W8
Tomorrow - 2moro Wicked - WKD
Cool - kwl Hang out - cotch
Mate - M8 Home - yard
Pizza - peetsa About - abwt
True - churoo Because - bcuz
That - dat Busy - bzy
Computer - compy These - deez
face to face - f2f Hate - H8
The Leveson inquiry heard the Prime Minister thought it meant 'lots of love', when in fact it means 'laugh out loud'.
A recent Ofcom report on children's media habits revealed texting is most prolific among 12-15-year-olds, who send an average of 193 every week.
This was double the amount on the previous year and more than four times the UK average.
Even eight to 11-year-olds were sending 41 texts each week.
Another survey of British adults found three-quarters believed words such as 'quashed', 'raconteur' and 'diabolical' have become outdated because of texting.
Frans Van Melis(CORR), vice president of Del Monte - which is sponsoring the Mencap School Spellathon, an online spelling bee - said the latest survey suggested text speak was eroding academic standards.
'The difficulty is that a lot of text speak is creeping into work that kids are doing in the classroom,' he added.
'Spelling has become much more fluid than it used to be which, on one level, is good - but, on another, doesn't help with academic attainment.'
The language issue of whether text speak is having a negative impact on how children are speaking is represented negatively. The dynamic verb 'tolerating' suggests that to speak in that manner is unacceptable and is only tolerable. 'Warned' also shows how the writer could be warning the reader about the language issue, portraying it negatively as it is something to beware of.
The writer represents the children in a negative way, possibly as the article is targeted at adults and parents due to the high register low frequency words. The adverb of frequency 'always' in the compound sentence 'Children are always complaining their parents don't understand them - and it seems they're right,' presents the children as annoying and constantly ungrateful. While the writer themselves presents no bias opinion of their own view, possibly because the article is from a broadsheet newspaper which would limit the amount of opinion the writer could demonstrate, quotes from Michael Gove, a prescriptivist, could suggest that the writer agrees with the prescriptivist view. This can also be supported by the use of compound sentences in the article which shows convergence to standard English and suggesting the writer is gaining prestige as they are presenting the information clearly and coherently.
In this way it can be argued that the writer is successful in shaping the readers response as they position the audience to agree with their view as their precise writing style and reference to important political figures presents them as knowledgeable which could therefore persuade people agree with their view. Also, his use of rhetorical questions with the second personal pronoun 'you' 'Do you know your text speak?' shows how the writer is targeting the reader of the article in order to convince them to accept their opinion. The rhetorical question makes the reader feel unintelligible to the text speak 'explosion'. The negative representation of it persuades the reader to side with the writer who is in the know and who can possibly inform them in order to keep up with the times and this new phenomena.